Ramu vs The Inspector of Police — 825/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKI010014382026
Filing Number
1111/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
825/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
KAVERIPATTINAM POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Petitioner(s)
Ramu
Umar Faruk
Abdul Kalam
Sabari
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Disposed
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 09-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 825/2026 Summary The Krishnagiri Principal Sessions Court granted bail to accused Ramu, Umar Faruk, and Abdul Kalam, arrested for alleged knife assault causing injuries during a festival. The court allowed the petition considering 19 days of incarceration and victims' hospital discharge, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police station reporting, interrogation availability, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 825/2026 Summary The Krishnagiri Principal Sessions Court granted bail to accused Ramu, Umar Faruk, and Abdul Kalam, arrested for alleged knife assault causing injuries during a festival. The court allowed the petition considering 19 days of incarceration and victims' hospital discharge, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police station reporting, interrogation availability, and prohibition on absconding or tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts