C.Muralithara vs P.Ghouse Basha Advocate - GOPALAKANNAN.K.B, BASKAR.K — 170/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1to6. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI010011412022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
292/2022
Filing Date
06-04-2022
Registration No
170/2022
Registration Date
11-04-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.Muralithara
Adv. RAVISANKAR.R.K
Respondent(s)
P.Ghouse Basha Advocate - GOPALAKANNAN.K.B, BASKAR.K
N. Ramachandran
N. Sridharan
V. Madhesan
R. Sekar
N. Saminathan
S. Suber
K.R. Vinod Kumar
A.H. Manzoor Basha
R. Chandiran
K. Narayana Kumar
F. Mohammed Abrar
G. Sameena
G. Salman
Ameen Sheik
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 170/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court permitted the defendants/petitioners to file three additional documents: (1) an original receipt dated 24.12.2020, (2) a certified copy of plaint from OS No. 450/2023, and (3) a xerox copy of a receipt from OS No. 450/2023. The court ruled that document admissibility and authenticity should be determined at trial, not at the pleading stage, and that excluding documents would prejudice the defendants' ability to present their case effectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 170/2022 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court permitted the defendants/petitioners to file three additional documents: (1) an original receipt dated 24.12.2020, (2) a certified copy of plaint from OS No. 450/2023, and (3) a xerox copy of a receipt from OS No. 450/2023. The court ruled that document admissibility and authenticity should be determined at trial, not at the pleading stage, and that excluding documents would prejudice the defendants' ability to present their case effectively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts