Venkatesh vs Raghu @ Raghupathi — 200933/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec 166. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI010008902018
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
100356/2018
Filing Date
27-09-2018
Registration No
200933/2018
Registration Date
28-09-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesh
Adv. YUVARAJ.V
Kasturi
Chandrakala
Respondent(s)
Raghu @ Raghupathi
T.Setu
The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Thirupathi.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Issue of Service
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 19-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 03-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition transcript from a motor vehicle accident case (Mcop.No. 949/2018, joint trial with 933/2018) in the Additional District Court, Krishnagiri. The witness (PW3) testified on 03.02.2026 regarding an accident involving a two-wheeler that overturned, resulting in injuries to 5-6 people, with one fatality (Durga). The witness provided examination-in-chief affirming the accident occurred, followed by cross-examination where the witness retracted or contradicted several statements, denying he drove the two-wheeler that day and claiming he gave false testimony under pressure. The deposition concluded with no re-examination. The case status remains ongoing trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition transcript from a motor vehicle accident case (Mcop.No. 949/2018, joint trial with 933/2018) in the Additional District Court, Krishnagiri. The witness (PW3) testified on 03.02.2026 regarding an accident involving a two-wheeler that overturned, resulting in injuries to 5-6 people, with one fatality (Durga). The witness provided examination-in-chief affirming the accident occurred, followed by cross-examination where the witness retracted or contradicted several statements, denying he drove the two-wheeler that day and claiming he gave false testimony under pressure. The deposition concluded with no re-examination. The case status remains ongoing trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts