S Kupendra Reddy vs V Kesavamoorthy — 21/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Section24and151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNKI010007072025
e-Filing Number
14-02-2025
Filing Number
195/2025
Filing Date
17-02-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
19-02-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S Kupendra Reddy
Adv. R NARAYANAN
Respondent(s)
V Kesavamoorthy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Disposed
Orders
Reopen
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | Orders |
| 09-04-2026 | Reopen |
| 01-04-2026 | Orders |
| 25-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Tr.O.P. No. 21/2025 The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed S. Kupendra Reddy's petition seeking to transfer O.S. No. 511/2021 from Denkanikottai Subordinate Court to Hosur Additional District Judge for joint trial with O.S. No. 124/2019. The court found both suits fundamentally different in nature—O.S. 124/2019 involves declaration of title and injunction against government authorities, while O.S. 511/2021 concerns only private parties seeking injunction and compensation. The court concluded issues, parties, and evidence requirements were not identical, transfer would inconvenience the respondent and witnesses, and the petition appeared designed to delay proceedings in an already advanced case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Tr.O.P. No. 21/2025 The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed S. Kupendra Reddy's petition seeking to transfer O.S. No. 511/2021 from Denkanikottai Subordinate Court to Hosur Additional District Judge for joint trial with O.S. No. 124/2019. The court found both suits fundamentally different in nature—O.S. 124/2019 involves declaration of title and injunction against government authorities, while O.S. 511/2021 concerns only private parties seeking injunction and compensation. The court concluded issues, parties, and evidence requirements were not identical, transfer would inconvenience the respondent and witnesses, and the petition appeared designed to delay proceedings in an already advanced case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts