S Kupendra Reddy vs V Kesavamoorthy — 21/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Section24and151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th April 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNKI010007072025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-02-2025

Filing Number

195/2025

Filing Date

17-02-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

19-02-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Section24and151

Petitioner(s)

S Kupendra Reddy

Adv. R NARAYANAN

Respondent(s)

V Kesavamoorthy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

27-04-2026

Disposed

24-04-2026

Orders

09-04-2026

Reopen

01-04-2026

Orders

25-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: Tr.O.P. No. 21/2025 The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed S. Kupendra Reddy's petition seeking to transfer O.S. No. 511/2021 from Denkanikottai Subordinate Court to Hosur Additional District Judge for joint trial with O.S. No. 124/2019. The court found both suits fundamentally different in nature—O.S. 124/2019 involves declaration of title and injunction against government authorities, while O.S. 511/2021 concerns only private parties seeking injunction and compensation. The court concluded issues, parties, and evidence requirements were not identical, transfer would inconvenience the respondent and witnesses, and the petition appeared designed to delay proceedings in an already advanced case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Tr.O.P. No. 21/2025 The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed S. Kupendra Reddy's petition seeking to transfer O.S. No. 511/2021 from Denkanikottai Subordinate Court to Hosur Additional District Judge for joint trial with O.S. No. 124/2019. The court found both suits fundamentally different in nature—O.S. 124/2019 involves declaration of title and injunction against government authorities, while O.S. 511/2021 concerns only private parties seeking injunction and compensation. The court concluded issues, parties, and evidence requirements were not identical, transfer would inconvenience the respondent and witnesses, and the petition appeared designed to delay proceedings in an already advanced case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case