Pochampalli Police Station vs Soundarapandiyan Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR.G — 49/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,506(2),326,149,352. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKI010006712023

Filing Number

504/2023

Filing Date

25-Jan-2023

Registration No

49/2023

Registration Date

02-Feb-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri

Judge

2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

POCHAMPALLI POLICE STATION

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,506(2),326,149,352
Tn Public Property (Prvnt.of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 Section 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pochampalli Police Station

    Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLI PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Soundarapandiyan Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR.G

  2. 2.Vijiya

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR.G

  3. 3.Jagadesan

  4. 4.Kamal

  5. 5.Venkatam

  6. 6.Pasuvaraj

  7. 7.Dhandapani

  8. 8.Ramadas

  9. 9.Dhanapal

  10. 10.Thirunavukarasu

  11. 11.Vimal

  12. 12.Jansirani

  13. 13.Dharman

  14. 14.Thirupathi (Abaragan)

  15. 15.Vasuki

  16. 16.Rajadurai

  17. 17.Rangadurai

  18. 18.Muthuvel

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: Session Case No. 49/2023 Court: Additional District Court, Krishnagiri Status: Witness examination in progress (dated 03.02.2026) This is a violent assault case involving 18 accused persons (A1-A14, A16-A18; A15 deceased). Eight prosecution witnesses testified that on 21-23 March 2019, they were attacked by a mob of 40-60 persons near Mavattur village. Witnesses claim the accused assaulted them with weapons, causing injuries, and damaged two vehicles valued at 3 lakhs. Witnesses acknowledge reconciliation occurred after police investigation but insisted their trial testimony is truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  11. 02-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  14. 15-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  15. 13-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  16. 10-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  19. 29-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  20. 24-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  21. 27-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  22. 23-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  23. 20-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  24. 23-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  25. 19-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  26. 15-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  27. 09-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  28. 15-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  29. 11-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  30. 23-Nov-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  31. 09-Nov-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  32. 12-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  33. 26-Sep-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  34. 02-Sep-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  35. 11-Aug-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  36. 11-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  37. 27-Jun-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  38. 08-Jun-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  39. 10-Apr-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  40. 20-Mar-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  41. 02-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  42. 27-Feb-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  43. 07-Feb-2023

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri

  44. 02-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 25-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Session Case No. 49/2023 Court: Additional District Court, Krishnagiri Status: Witness examination in progress (dated 03.02.2026) This is a violent assault case involving 18 accused persons (A1-A14, A16-A18; A15 deceased). Eight prosecution witnesses testified that on 21-23 March 2019, they were attacked by a mob of 40-60 persons near Mavattur village. Witnesses claim the accused assaulted them with weapons, causing injuries, and damaged two vehicles valued at 3 lakhs. Witnesses acknowledge reconciliation occurred after police investigation but insisted their trial testimony is truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case