Saravanan vs Junior Engineer Managing Director TANGEDGO Uthangarai Unit — 11/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1-6. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI010001192023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
18/2023
Filing Date
04-01-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
07-01-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saravanan
Adv. MOORTHI S
Sakthivel
Sathya
Respondent(s)
Junior Engineer Managing Director TANGEDGO Uthangarai Unit
Assistant Excutive Engineer,TANGEDCO
Excutive Engineer, TANGEDCO Managing Directing, TANGEDCO
Superitendent Engineer, TANGEDCO
Theerthagiri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 11/2023 Court: Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri Outcome: Witness testimony (DW.2) was solemnly affirmed on 03.07.2025. The case involves an electrical accident where a power line fell on 03.10.2022, injuring a person (Eswari). The defendant witness testified that the petitioner bears responsibility for the accident due to an improperly maintained UPS connection on his property, which caused current to reverse and reach Eswari's location. The defendant claims the TANGEDCO (electricity board) failed to maintain the power line for 65 years. Both parties dispute liability for compensation of ₹30,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 11/2023 Court: Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri Outcome: Witness testimony (DW.2) was solemnly affirmed on 03.07.2025. The case involves an electrical accident where a power line fell on 03.10.2022, injuring a person (Eswari). The defendant witness testified that the petitioner bears responsibility for the accident due to an improperly maintained UPS connection on his property, which caused current to reverse and reach Eswari's location. The defendant claims the TANGEDCO (electricity board) failed to maintain the power line for 65 years. Both parties dispute liability for compensation of ₹30,00,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts