Sandhiya vs Kannan — 19/2025
Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNKA100062212025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
6202/2025
Filing Date
20-Sep-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
20-Sep-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Ulundurpet
Judge
22-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sandhiya
Adv. P RANJITHKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kannan
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
18-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
In case DVC.19/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ulundurpet, witness Sandhiya (petitioner) filed the case against respondent Kannan seeking maintenance and compensation. On 18.06.2026, Sandhiya's deposition was recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code; she affirmed her written statement and supporting documents were marked as evidence. The cross-examination of the respondent was adjourned, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
13-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
10-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
26-Feb-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
29-Jan-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
30-Dec-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
27-Nov-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2025
In case DVC.19/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ulundurpet, witness Sandhiya (petitioner) filed the case against respondent Kannan seeking maintenance and compensation. On 18.06.2026, Sandhiya's deposition was recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code; she affirmed her written statement and supporting documents were marked as evidence. The cross-examination of the respondent was adjourned, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts