E KOTTAI KANNAN vs KALIYAPERUMAL — 1262/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),323,324,355,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKA100047892025
e-Filing Number
26-07-2025
Filing Number
4779/2025
Filing Date
04-Aug-2025
Registration No
1262/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Ulundurpet
Judge
22-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Decision Date
27-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Elavanasoorkottai P.S.
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.E KOTTAI KANNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALIYAPERUMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC 1262/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused persons 1 and 5 (who had deceased), and convicted accused persons 2, 3, and 4 under IPC sections 148, 323 (and 324, 506(ii) for accused 3) for rioting and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found government witnesses and medical evidence sufficiently proved the charges, while the defense provided no controverting testimony, warranting conviction under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
26-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
25-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
25-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
22-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
21-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
19-Feb-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate No.I
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1262/2025
Case Summary: CC 1262/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused persons 1 and 5 (who had deceased), and convicted accused persons 2, 3, and 4 under IPC sections 148, 323 (and 324, 506(ii) for accused 3) for rioting and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found government witnesses and medical evidence sufficiently proved the charges, while the defense provided no controverting testimony, warranting conviction under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts