Alamelu NI Act vs Indrajith — 59/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKA100021812024
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
2175/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Courts, Ulundurpet
Judge
22-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alamelu NI Act
Adv. Mr.M.Kirubapuri, M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Indrajith
Hearing History
Judge: 22-Judicial Magistrate No.I
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.59/2024 - Alamelu NI Act v. Indrajith This is a witness deposition (P.W. 2) recorded on 20.01.2026 in Criminal Case 59/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Ulundurpet. The witness, an SBI Bank manager from Ulundurpet, testified regarding bank account no. 20169462283 held in the name of respondent Indrajith, including details of a cheque (no. 207357 dated 19.03.2024) that was returned unpaid on 25.03.2024 due to insufficient funds, and produced the bank statement as evidence. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to and admitted as correct by the witness, with no cross-examination by the respondent noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.59/2024 - Alamelu NI Act v. Indrajith This is a witness deposition (P.W. 2) recorded on 20.01.2026 in Criminal Case 59/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Ulundurpet. The witness, an SBI Bank manager from Ulundurpet, testified regarding bank account no. 20169462283 held in the name of respondent Indrajith, including details of a cheque (no. 207357 dated 19.03.2024) that was returned unpaid on 25.03.2024 due to insufficient funds, and produced the bank statement as evidence. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to and admitted as correct by the witness, with no cross-examination by the respondent noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts