SHO CYBER CRIME vs No Accused — 3593/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKA020072812025

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

7092/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

3593/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kallakurichi

Judge

10-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

03

Police Station

Cyber Crime P.S Kallakurichi

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420
Information Technology Act 2000 Section 66C,66D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) CYBER CRIME

    Adv. Inspector of Police Cybercrime PS KLK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.No Accused

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Kallakurichi Chief Judicial Magistrate Court accepted the police closure report filed by the Cyber Crime unit after the de facto complainant appeared, was identified via Aadhar verification, and stated no objection to closure. The court, satisfied with the reasons for closure, accepted the report and closed both the FIR and the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  6. 06-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3593/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Kallakurichi Chief Judicial Magistrate Court accepted the police closure report filed by the Cyber Crime unit after the de facto complainant appeared, was identified via Aadhar verification, and stated no objection to closure. The court, satisfied with the reasons for closure, accepted the report and closed both the FIR and the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case