SHO CSCID Kallakurichi PS vs Karthik (Bail) — 858/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 26th May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKA020010232026

Filing Number

938/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

858/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kallakurichi

Judge

10-Judicial Magistrate No.I

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

Kallakurichi CSCID P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) CSCID Kallakurichi PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Elavarasu C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karthik (Bail)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.858/2026 The court granted bail to Karthik, who was arrested for smuggling 850 kg of ration rice under TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 and EC Act provisions. The court found no prior criminal record and considered that he had already spent 6 days in custody, noting the maxim "bail is the rule, jail is exception." Bail was granted with conditions including a personal bond of ₹10,000, two sureties of ₹30,000 each, 10-day police reporting requirement, identity document submission, and undertakings not to intimidate witnesses or engage in further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I

  4. 22-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No.858/2026 The court granted bail to Karthik, who was arrested for smuggling 850 kg of ration rice under TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 and EC Act provisions. The court found no prior criminal record and considered that he had already spent 6 days in custody, noting the maxim "bail is the rule, jail is exception." Bail was granted with conditions including a personal bond of ₹10,000, two sureties of ₹30,000 each, 10-day police reporting requirement, identity document submission, and undertakings not to intimidate witnesses or engage in further criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case