Samiyathal vs The District Collector, Erode — 228/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED230010912024

Filing Number

211/2024

Filing Date

19-Jun-2023

Registration No

228/2024

Registration Date

08-Sep-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi

Judge

40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samiyathal

    Adv. B. Boopathi

  2. 2.ChitraDevi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector, Erode

  2. 2.The Thasildar, Modakurichi Tk.,

  3. 3.The Village Administration Officer, Kagam Village.

  4. 4.The President, Kagam Uratchi, Kagam Village

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Elumathur dismissed the plaintiff's suit due to the plaintiff's default (failure to appear). The court found the plaintiffs' negligence to be the reason for dismissal and declined to pass any substantive orders on the merits of the case, which involved a property dispute regarding alleged encroachment and unauthorized occupation of residential property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  16. 21-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  17. 16-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  18. 09-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  19. 17-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  20. 26-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  21. 10-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  22. 20-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 18-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  25. 04-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  26. 25-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  27. 23-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  28. 16-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  29. 06-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 19-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Elumathur dismissed the plaintiff's suit due to the plaintiff's default (failure to appear). The court found the plaintiffs' negligence to be the reason for dismissal and declined to pass any substantive orders on the merits of the case, which involved a property dispute regarding alleged encroachment and unauthorized occupation of residential property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case