SI of Police, Modakuruchi PS vs Vellaisamy Advocate - Dhandapani. V — 108/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A),338. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED230009292024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
252/2024
Filing Date
23-11-2022
Registration No
108/2024
Registration Date
23-11-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi
Judge
40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
Modakurichi Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Modakuruchi PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Sureshkumar
Vinayak
Palanisamy
Ramu
Lakshmi
Dheivrani
Deepa.T.
Respondent(s)
Vellaisamy Advocate - Dhandapani. V
Hearing History
Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court recorded the deposition of witness PW9 on 17th March 2026 in case CC.No.108/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Elumathur. The witness provided testimony regarding a traffic accident case involving charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 304(A), including details of the scene investigation, autopsy report, and statements from multiple witnesses. During cross-examination, the defense challenged certain claims made during the investigation, and the court noted no contradictory evidence was found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court recorded the deposition of witness PW9 on 17th March 2026 in case CC.No.108/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Elumathur. The witness provided testimony regarding a traffic accident case involving charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 304(A), including details of the scene investigation, autopsy report, and statements from multiple witnesses. During cross-examination, the defense challenged certain claims made during the investigation, and the court noted no contradictory evidence was found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts