Sivagami vs Thangavel — 98/2024
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED230008032024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2024
Filing Date
23-04-2021
Registration No
98/2024
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi
Judge
40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivagami
Adv. C. Nachimuthu
Respondent(s)
Thangavel
Ganpathi
Hearing History
Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
IA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts