Sivagami vs Thangavel — 98/2024

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED230008032024

IA Pending

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

152/2024

Filing Date

23-04-2021

Registration No

98/2024

Registration Date

23-04-2021

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi

Judge

40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Sivagami

Adv. C. Nachimuthu

Respondent(s)

Thangavel

Ganpathi

Hearing History

Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

27-04-2026

IA Pending

24-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

29-01-2025
Copy of Deposition

This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case