Sivagami vs Thangavel — 98/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED230008032024

Filing Number

152/2024

Filing Date

23-Apr-2021

Registration No

98/2024

Registration Date

23-Apr-2021

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi

Judge

40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sivagami

    Adv. C. Nachimuthu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangavel

  2. 2.Ganpathi

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  12. 05-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Reopen

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  16. 22-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  18. 01-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  19. 25-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  21. 06-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  22. 28-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  23. 16-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  24. 02-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  25. 09-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  26. 21-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  27. 07-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  29. 17-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  30. 05-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  31. 26-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  32. 17-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  33. 10-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  34. 29-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  35. 29-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  36. 06-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  37. 16-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  38. 02-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  39. 21-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  40. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  41. 23-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  42. 16-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

  43. 04-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 23-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil case concerning a land sale transaction dispute heard in the District Munsif Court, Ezhumathur, Tamil Nadu on 29.01.2025 (Case No. 98/2024). The court's order records the cross-examination of the defendant (Tangavel), where he testifies regarding details of a property sale agreement, including claims about the land area (1595 sq.ft.), the consideration amount (Rs. 50,000), and the execution of power of attorney documents. The court affirms certain facts presented by the witness while rejecting others, ultimately finding that the sale was properly executed despite some procedural irregularities, and no further cross-examination is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case