Modakurichi P.S vs Kumaresan — 31/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNED230002492025

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

232/2025

Filing Date

20-02-2025

Registration No

31/2025

Registration Date

20-02-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi

Judge

40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Modakurichi Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 392
MP/32/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KumaresanModakurichi P.S

Petitioner(s)

Modakurichi P.S

Manokaran

Ramakrishnan

Pasil

Senthilkumar

Chitra

Duraisamy

Vinothkumar

Rajagopal

Periyannan

Senthilkumar

Myilananth

Thillaikarasan

Arichandra

Subramani

Respondent(s)

Kumaresan

Esakkipandi.S

Hearing History

Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

09-04-2026

Evidence

26-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

27-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: CC.No. 31/2025, District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Elumathur Village, Modakurichi Taluk Outcome: Witness depositions (PW5, PW6, PW7) recorded on 10th March 2026 under Chapter XXV of BNSS 2023. The witnesses testified regarding a robbery case (involving theft of approximately ₹47,000-₹48,200 from an HP petrol pump), and their statements were recorded with cross-examination concluded without opposition from the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: CC.No. 31/2025, District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Elumathur Village, Modakurichi Taluk Outcome: Witness depositions (PW5, PW6, PW7) recorded on 10th March 2026 under Chapter XXV of BNSS 2023. The witnesses testified regarding a robbery case (involving theft of approximately ₹47,000-₹48,200 from an HP petrol pump), and their statements were recorded with cross-examination concluded without opposition from the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case