P.Gowthaman vs N.Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S — 26/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 17th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNED230001342025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

123/2025

Filing Date

28-01-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

28-01-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi

Judge

40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

P.Gowthaman

Adv. Krishnamoorthy. K

Respondent(s)

N.Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S

Hearing History

Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

IA Pending

04-03-2026

IA Pending

04-02-2026

IA Pending

12-12-2025

IA Pending

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to produce bank account statements from State Bank of India, Central Cooperative Bank, and Karur Vysya Bank, along with the 2024-2025 income tax return and asset details, to verify claims of income concealment and undisclosed assets. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of financial irregularities and ordered production of specific financial documents while rejecting other documentary demands deemed unnecessary for case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to produce bank account statements from State Bank of India, Central Cooperative Bank, and Karur Vysya Bank, along with the 2024-2025 income tax return and asset details, to verify claims of income concealment and undisclosed assets. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of financial irregularities and ordered production of specific financial documents while rejecting other documentary demands deemed unnecessary for case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case