P.Gowthaman vs N.Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S — 26/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 17th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNED230001342025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
123/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Modakurichi
Judge
40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Gowthaman
Adv. Krishnamoorthy. K
Respondent(s)
N.Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S
Hearing History
Judge: 40-District Munsif -Cum - Judicial Magistrate, Modakurichi
Disposed
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 04-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 04-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 12-12-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to produce bank account statements from State Bank of India, Central Cooperative Bank, and Karur Vysya Bank, along with the 2024-2025 income tax return and asset details, to verify claims of income concealment and undisclosed assets. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of financial irregularities and ordered production of specific financial documents while rejecting other documentary demands deemed unnecessary for case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to produce bank account statements from State Bank of India, Central Cooperative Bank, and Karur Vysya Bank, along with the 2024-2025 income tax return and asset details, to verify claims of income concealment and undisclosed assets. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of financial irregularities and ordered production of specific financial documents while rejecting other documentary demands deemed unnecessary for case resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts