Vijayakumar S/o. Muthusamy vs N. Periyasamy and 15 others Advocate - Prem Anand. M.P — 7/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OVIIR1S151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED220004092024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
198/2024
Filing Date
25-08-2015
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
27-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Kodumudi
Judge
2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijayakumar S/o. Muthusamy
Adv. Shanmugasundram.K
Respondent(s)
N. Periyasamy and 15 others Advocate - Prem Anand. M.P
Thirumathal
Adv. K. Ananda Kumar
K. Periyasamy
Adv. K. Ananda Kumar
Poovathal
Adv. K. Ananda Kumar
Rukmani
Adv. K. Ananda Kumar
P. Jothimani
Adv. K. Ananda Kumar
Vijayalakshmi
Malayammal
Arukkani
Saroja
Subramani
Palaniammal
The Executive Officer
Superintendent Engineer
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
JUNIOR ENGINEER
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition/witness examination record, not a court order with a final judgment or ruling. Witness Vijayakumar was examined and cross-examined on April 10, 2026, in cases A.V. No. 07/2024 and 30/2024 before the Subordinate Court at Kodumudi (Erode District). The witness's testimony regarding property documents and survey numbers was recorded and acknowledged as correct; however, no substantive order (bail, petition decision, or case adjournment) is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition/witness examination record, not a court order with a final judgment or ruling. Witness Vijayakumar was examined and cross-examined on April 10, 2026, in cases A.V. No. 07/2024 and 30/2024 before the Subordinate Court at Kodumudi (Erode District). The witness's testimony regarding property documents and survey numbers was recorded and acknowledged as correct; however, no substantive order (bail, petition decision, or case adjournment) is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts