S. Arumugam @ Arumugam Samiappa Gounder vs P.M. Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S — 145/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7, R 1 S 151. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED220003172024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2024
Filing Date
06-06-2022
Registration No
145/2024
Registration Date
06-06-2022
Court
Sub Court, Kodumudi
Judge
2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Arumugam @ Arumugam Samiappa Gounder
Adv. Sivanandam.K
Respondent(s)
P.M. Chinnasamy Advocate - Devarajan.S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Judge of Kodumudi decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff S. Arumugam, directing defendant P.M. Chinnasamy to pay Rs. 3,65,167 with interest at 9% per annum until decree date and 6% thereafter, based on a dishonored cheque of Rs. 3,50,000 issued for a personal loan. The court found the plaintiff's claim proven through documentary evidence (the cheque and return memo) and a prior criminal conviction of the defendant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite the defendant's denial of issuing the cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Judge of Kodumudi decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff S. Arumugam, directing defendant P.M. Chinnasamy to pay Rs. 3,65,167 with interest at 9% per annum until decree date and 6% thereafter, based on a dishonored cheque of Rs. 3,50,000 issued for a personal loan. The court found the plaintiff's claim proven through documentary evidence (the cheque and return memo) and a prior criminal conviction of the defendant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite the defendant's denial of issuing the cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts