Dhanalakshmi W/o. late Manickam vs Premkumar S/o.Anbalagan — 27/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNED220000592024

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-07-2024

Filing Number

29/2024

Filing Date

26-07-2024

Registration No

27/2024

Registration Date

27-08-2024

Court

Sub Court, Kodumudi

Judge

2-Sub Court, Kodumudi

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Dhanalakshmi W/o. late Manickam

Adv. Arulmurugan M

Vivekananthan S/o.S. Manickam

Adv. Arulmurugan M

Sangeetha D/o. Late Manickam

Adv. Arulmurugan M

Sudha D/o. late Manickam

Adv. Arulmurugan M

Respondent(s)

Premkumar S/o.Anbalagan

Prakash S/o. Anbalagan

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Pondicherry

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Erode

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Court, Kodumudi

24-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a deposition (witness testimony) recorded in M.COP.No. 27/2024 at the Subordinate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District on 20.04.2026. The witness testified regarding a dispute involving a person named Manikam, providing evidence about witnessing the incident and subsequent events, and confirmed his account was accurate. No cross-examination was conducted, and the deposition was recorded and acknowledged as correct by the witness before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition (witness testimony) recorded in M.COP.No. 27/2024 at the Subordinate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District on 20.04.2026. The witness testified regarding a dispute involving a person named Manikam, providing evidence about witnessing the incident and subsequent events, and confirmed his account was accurate. No cross-examination was conducted, and the deposition was recorded and acknowledged as correct by the witness before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Kodumudi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case