Dhanalakshmi W/o. late Manickam vs Premkumar S/o.Anbalagan — 27/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNED220000592024

e-Filing Number

04-07-2024

Filing Number

29/2024

Filing Date

26-Jul-2024

Registration No

27/2024

Registration Date

27-Aug-2024

Court

Sub Court, Kodumudi

Judge

2-Sub Court, Kodumudi

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhanalakshmi W/o. late Manickam

    Adv. Arulmurugan M

  2. 2.Vivekananthan S/o.S. Manickam

    Adv. Arulmurugan M

  3. 3.Sangeetha D/o. Late Manickam

    Adv. Arulmurugan M

  4. 4.Sudha D/o. late Manickam

    Adv. Arulmurugan M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Premkumar S/o.Anbalagan

  2. 2.Prakash S/o. Anbalagan

  3. 3.Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Pondicherry

  4. 4.Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd Erode

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a deposition (witness testimony) recorded in M.COP.No. 27/2024 at the Subordinate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District on 20.04.2026. The witness testified regarding a dispute involving a person named Manikam, providing evidence about witnessing the incident and subsequent events, and confirmed his account was accurate. No cross-examination was conducted, and the deposition was recorded and acknowledged as correct by the witness before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  19. 14-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  20. 06-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  22. 29-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  24. 11-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  26. 01-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  27. 02-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  28. 07-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  29. 10-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  30. 24-Feb-2025

    Await Notice

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  31. 27-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  32. 06-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  33. 09-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  34. 11-Nov-2024

    Batta

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  35. 21-Oct-2024

    Batta

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  36. 07-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Sub Court, Kodumudi

  37. 27-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 26-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition (witness testimony) recorded in M.COP.No. 27/2024 at the Subordinate Court, Kodumudi, Erode District on 20.04.2026. The witness testified regarding a dispute involving a person named Manikam, providing evidence about witnessing the incident and subsequent events, and confirmed his account was accurate. No cross-examination was conducted, and the deposition was recorded and acknowledged as correct by the witness before the Subordinate Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case