Saraswathi W/o. Raman vs Ravi S/o. K.Thangavel Advocate - Gopalakrishnan. R.K — 6/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNED220000212024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2024
Filing Date
26-04-2023
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
27-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Kodumudi
Judge
2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saraswathi W/o. Raman
Adv. Muthu Kumar.C
Respondent(s)
Ravi S/o. K.Thangavel Advocate - Gopalakrishnan. R.K
Sakthi blue metals P. Ltd., Namakkal dt.,
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Court, Kodumudi
Evidence
Evidence
Issue of Service
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a medical deposition from Kodumudi Subordinate Court (MC OP No. 06/2024) dated 10.11.2025, documenting testimony by a doctor regarding injuries sustained by a patient in a vehicular accident on 02.02.2023. The doctor testified about multiple fractures (ankle, pelvis, sacrum, coccyx) and lacerations requiring three surgical interventions with metal implants, estimated treatment cost of ₹1,25,000, and stated that future surgery would be needed to remove the implants after 2 years of healing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a medical deposition from Kodumudi Subordinate Court (MC OP No. 06/2024) dated 10.11.2025, documenting testimony by a doctor regarding injuries sustained by a patient in a vehicular accident on 02.02.2023. The doctor testified about multiple fractures (ankle, pelvis, sacrum, coccyx) and lacerations requiring three surgical interventions with metal implants, estimated treatment cost of ₹1,25,000, and stated that future surgery would be needed to remove the implants after 2 years of healing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts