State Government represented by represented by the inspector of police, Ammapettai vs Thangaraj — 143/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2),326. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED140047962022
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4792/2022
Filing Date
05-09-2022
Registration No
143/2022
Registration Date
05-09-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
FIR Details
FIR Number
65
Police Station
Ammapettai Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government represented by represented by the inspector of police, Ammapettai
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Thangaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (PW-3) in Criminal Case No. 143/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Bhavani, relating to a dispute between two families (Irusappan and Tangaraju families) at Ammapet police station. The witness testified on 20.05.2025 regarding his presence at the crime scene and his signature on police documents (marked as Exhibit A.Sa.A.2 and A.Sa.A.3), with the defense challenging the credibility of his statements during cross-examination. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of a prosecution witness (PW-3) in Criminal Case No. 143/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Bhavani, relating to a dispute between two families (Irusappan and Tangaraju families) at Ammapet police station. The witness testified on 20.05.2025 regarding his presence at the crime scene and his signature on police documents (marked as Exhibit A.Sa.A.2 and A.Sa.A.3), with the defense challenging the credibility of his statements during cross-examination. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts