State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police vs Mohan S/o. Govinthan — 328/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,355,506(1). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 15-May-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNED140032982024

e-Filing Number

10-07-2024

Filing Number

3295/2024

Filing Date

10-Jul-2024

Registration No

328/2024

Registration Date

10-Jul-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate No.1

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

251

Police Station

Ammapettai Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,355,506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police

    Adv. Inspector of Police AMMAPETTAI POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohan S/o. Govinthan

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  16. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  17. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  19. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  21. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  23. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  24. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  25. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  26. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  27. 21-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  28. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  29. 09-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  30. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  31. 20-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  32. 07-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  33. 24-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  34. 17-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  35. 12-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  36. 08-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  37. 26-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  38. 20-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  39. 13-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  40. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  41. 20-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  42. 19-Feb-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  43. 13-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: STC.No.328/2024 | Date: 13.02.2025 Outcome: The court found substantial deficiencies in the investigation and police proceedings. The court noted inconsistencies in witness statements, lack of proper corroboration, and failure to record statements from neighboring witnesses despite claiming the incident occurred near their residence. The court concluded that the FIR was registered and final report filed against the accused without proper and complete investigation, thereby quashing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  44. 13-Feb-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  45. 08-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  46. 12-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  47. 21-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  48. 06-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  49. 16-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  50. 16-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  51. 04-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  52. 19-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  53. 10-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  54. 04-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  55. 03-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  56. 29-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  57. 29-Aug-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  58. 27-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  59. 20-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  60. 20-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  61. 14-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  62. 14-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  63. 08-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  64. 01-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  65. 18-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No.1

  66. 10-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 10-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 328/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: STC.No.328/2024 | Date: 13.02.2025 Outcome: The court found substantial deficiencies in the investigation and police proceedings. The court noted inconsistencies in witness statements, lack of proper corroboration, and failure to record statements from neighboring witnesses despite claiming the incident occurred near their residence. The court concluded that the FIR was registered and final report filed against the accused without proper and complete investigation, thereby quashing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case