State of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector of Police Bhavani, Bhavani Police Station vs THANGAMANI Advocate - A.Rajendrakumar — 3/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED140023492025
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
27-12-2025
Filing Number
2348/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
FIR Details
FIR Number
439
Police Station
Bhavani Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector of Police Bhavani, Bhavani Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Bhavani police station
Respondent(s)
THANGAMANI Advocate - A.Rajendrakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Trial
Trial
Trial
Questioning
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 17-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-02-2026 | Questioning | |
| 03-01-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Bhavani charged the accused Thangamani under sections 281 (rash driving) and 125(b) (causing hurt) of the BNSS for allegedly hitting pedestrian Kandaswamy with a two-wheeler (TN 36 85 4542) on 26.08.2025 at 19:50 hours, causing injury. The court ordered that an inquiry/investigation be conducted into the charges, and during the hearing on 17.02.2026, the accused pleaded that the case was false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Bhavani charged the accused Thangamani under sections 281 (rash driving) and 125(b) (causing hurt) of the BNSS for allegedly hitting pedestrian Kandaswamy with a two-wheeler (TN 36 85 4542) on 26.08.2025 at 19:50 hours, causing injury. The court ordered that an inquiry/investigation be conducted into the charges, and during the hearing on 17.02.2026, the accused pleaded that the case was false. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts