State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Bhavani Police Station vs A1-Arumugam S/o.Ammasai, A2-Sundarraj S/o.Sengodan Advocate - E.Senthilkumar — 34/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294 (b) , 448 , 352 IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED140019562024
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2024
Filing Number
1953/2024
Filing Date
25-03-2024
Registration No
34/2024
Registration Date
25-03-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
FIR Details
FIR Number
540
Police Station
Bhavani Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police Bhavani Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Bhavani police station
Respondent(s)
A1-Arumugam S/o.Ammasai, A2-Sundarraj S/o.Sengodan Advocate - E.Senthilkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document records the depositions of two prosecution witnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) in Criminal Case No. 34/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani, on November 10, 2025. Both witnesses testified regarding allegations of criminal intimidation and assault by the two accused, with their statements being taken under oath, read back, and admitted as correct. Cross-examination of both witnesses by the defense counsel was completed as per judicial directions, and no further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document records the depositions of two prosecution witnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) in Criminal Case No. 34/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani, on November 10, 2025. Both witnesses testified regarding allegations of criminal intimidation and assault by the two accused, with their statements being taken under oath, read back, and admitted as correct. Cross-examination of both witnesses by the defense counsel was completed as per judicial directions, and no further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts