State of Tamilnadu Rep By Special Sub Inspector of Police Appakoodal Police Station vs Raju (M G R) Advocate - K.M.Venkidusamy — 471/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C),TNP Act. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED140014572025
e-Filing Number
01-09-2025
Filing Number
1457/2025
Filing Date
05-09-2025
Registration No
471/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Appakudal Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamilnadu Rep By Special Sub Inspector of Police Appakoodal Police Station
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Appakoodal PS
Respondent(s)
Raju (M G R) Advocate - K.M.Venkidusamy
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Disposed
Judgement
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Bhavani Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused (Raju) of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act for allegedly possessing and selling 10 bottles of Express Brandy without state authorization. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing critical procedural violations including: improper seizure procedures that did not follow Section 32 of the TN Prohibition Act (which requires sample drawing and destruction in presence of an authorized officer), lack of independent witnesses, and uncertainty about whether the quantity seized (1260 ml) exceeded personal consumption limits (4.5 liters permitted under state rules). The accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Bhavani Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused (Raju) of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act for allegedly possessing and selling 10 bottles of Express Brandy without state authorization. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing critical procedural violations including: improper seizure procedures that did not follow Section 32 of the TN Prohibition Act (which requires sample drawing and destruction in presence of an authorized officer), lack of independent witnesses, and uncertainty about whether the quantity seized (1260 ml) exceeded personal consumption limits (4.5 liters permitted under state rules). The accused was acquitted and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts