SI of police, Appakodal PS vs Subramani Advocate - A.Rajendrakumar — 66/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1).BNS. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED140000302025
e-Filing Number
15-12-2024
Filing Number
30/2025
Filing Date
11-01-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
17-03-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
256
Police Station
Appakudal Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of police, Appakodal PS (Police Station)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Appakoodal PS
Respondent(s)
Subramani Advocate - A.Rajendrakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate No.1
Disposed
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the defendant Subramani of charges under IPC Sections 281 and 106(i) (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-case. While the prosecution proved a road accident occurred on June 18, 2024, causing injury to one Tamilarasi, the court found insufficient evidence to establish the defendant's rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, noting contradictions in eyewitness testimonies and lack of direct proof linking the defendant's conduct to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the defendant Subramani of charges under IPC Sections 281 and 106(i) (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-case. While the prosecution proved a road accident occurred on June 18, 2024, causing injury to one Tamilarasi, the court found insufficient evidence to establish the defendant's rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt, noting contradictions in eyewitness testimonies and lack of direct proof linking the defendant's conduct to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts