Palanisamy vs Ramasamy — 100108/2016

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 151. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNED110004072016

Part Heard

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100145/2016

Filing Date

19-09-2016

Registration No

100108/2016

Registration Date

21-09-2016

Court

Sub Court, Perundurai

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Palanisamy

Adv. S.Sengottian

Respondent(s)

Ramasamy

Chenniappan

Sengoda Gounder

Durairaj

Loganayaki

Kannammal

Jeyalakshmi

P. Hemamalini

Pradeep

Thangamuthu

Viswanathan

Devendran

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

16-04-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

10-03-2026

Part Heard

04-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary In OS No. 108/2016 before the Subordinate Court, Perundurai, the examination-in-chief of the 4th defendant witness (Pradeep Kumar Swaran, age 35) was conducted on 10.03.2026 under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed his affidavit and identified eight documentary exhibits including property transfer deed, sale certificate, utility bills, and tax receipts. Cross-examination by defendants 10-12 was noted as "no cross" (not conducted), and the cross-examination by plaintiff's counsel was adjourned as requested by the defendant's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 108/2016 before the Subordinate Court, Perundurai, the examination-in-chief of the 4th defendant witness (Pradeep Kumar Swaran, age 35) was conducted on 10.03.2026 under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness affirmed his affidavit and identified eight documentary exhibits including property transfer deed, sale certificate, utility bills, and tax receipts. Cross-examination by defendants 10-12 was noted as "no cross" (not conducted), and the cross-examination by plaintiff's counsel was adjourned as requested by the defendant's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Perundurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case