Karur Vysya Bank vs Kanimalar Rathinasamy — 85/2025
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED110003542025
Filing Number
360/2025
Filing Date
18-Jul-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
24-Jul-2025
Court
Sub Court, Perundurai
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karur Vysya Bank
Adv. MUTHU V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kanimalar Rathinasamy
-
2.Rathinasamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
This document is a witness statement (PW 1) recorded in the Assistant Sessions Court, Perundurai (Case No. 131/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The witness, a 60-year-old man from Tindukkal village, testified about his experience of being kidnapped and assaulted by four accused persons (Ragu, Aravind, Senthil Kumar, and Kanakasabapathi) in September 2017. The witness detailed how the accused abducted him, demanded ransom of ₹5 lakhs, assaulted him with weapons, and caused him injuries requiring 15 days of hospitalization, but no cross-examination from the defense was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2025
This document is a witness statement (PW 1) recorded in the Assistant Sessions Court, Perundurai (Case No. 131/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The witness, a 60-year-old man from Tindukkal village, testified about his experience of being kidnapped and assaulted by four accused persons (Ragu, Aravind, Senthil Kumar, and Kanakasabapathi) in September 2017. The witness detailed how the accused abducted him, demanded ransom of ₹5 lakhs, assaulted him with weapons, and caused him injuries requiring 15 days of hospitalization, but no cross-examination from the defense was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts