Karur Vysya Bank vs Kanimalar Rathinasamy — 85/2025

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 12th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED110003542025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

360/2025

Filing Date

18-07-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

24-07-2025

Court

Sub Court, Perundurai

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Karur Vysya Bank

Adv. MUTHU V

Respondent(s)

Kanimalar Rathinasamy

Rathinasamy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Judgement

17-12-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

18-11-2025

Steps

26-09-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

This document is a witness statement (PW 1) recorded in the Assistant Sessions Court, Perundurai (Case No. 131/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The witness, a 60-year-old man from Tindukkal village, testified about his experience of being kidnapped and assaulted by four accused persons (Ragu, Aravind, Senthil Kumar, and Kanakasabapathi) in September 2017. The witness detailed how the accused abducted him, demanded ransom of ₹5 lakhs, assaulted him with weapons, and caused him injuries requiring 15 days of hospitalization, but no cross-examination from the defense was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness statement (PW 1) recorded in the Assistant Sessions Court, Perundurai (Case No. 131/2024) dated March 10, 2026, under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The witness, a 60-year-old man from Tindukkal village, testified about his experience of being kidnapped and assaulted by four accused persons (Ragu, Aravind, Senthil Kumar, and Kanakasabapathi) in September 2017. The witness detailed how the accused abducted him, demanded ransom of ₹5 lakhs, assaulted him with weapons, and caused him injuries requiring 15 days of hospitalization, but no cross-examination from the defense was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Perundurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case