M.K. Rajendran vs Malliga — 100060/2015

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 42,22. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Await Reports Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit (Money)

CNR: TNED110001582015

Filing Number

189/2015

Filing Date

20-Mar-2015

Registration No

100060/2015

Registration Date

21-May-2015

Court

Sub Court, Perundurai

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 42,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.K. Rajendran

    Adv. N.S. Sakthivel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Malliga

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a witness examination record (PW2 testimony) in OS No. 188/2017 from the Subordinate Court, Perundurai, dated March 10, 2026. The witness (Aanandamuthu, age 90) was examined on oath under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and confirmed the authenticity of documentary evidence submitted on his behalf. The court noted the witness's acknowledgment of the documents and their contents during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Restored

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 17-Apr-2018

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 10-Apr-2018

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 23-Mar-2018

    Restored

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 10-Oct-2017

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 21-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 14-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 06-Sep-2017

    Restored

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 08-Nov-2016

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 24-Oct-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 04-Oct-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 23-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 12-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 31-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 19-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 12-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 26-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 06-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 24-Jun-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 03-Jun-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 31-Mar-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 17-Mar-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 08-Mar-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 29-Feb-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 26-Feb-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 22-Jan-2016

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 18-Dec-2015

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 27-Nov-2015

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 30-Oct-2015

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 06-Oct-2015

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 23-Sep-2015

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 20-Aug-2015

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 20-Jul-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 20-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100060/2015

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination record (PW2 testimony) in OS No. 188/2017 from the Subordinate Court, Perundurai, dated March 10, 2026. The witness (Aanandamuthu, age 90) was examined on oath under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and confirmed the authenticity of documentary evidence submitted on his behalf. The court noted the witness's acknowledgment of the documents and their contents during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case