Canara Bank Bungalowpudur Rep by its Branch Manager vs S Aruljoshep — 259/2025

Case under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED090003352024

e-Filing Number

02-08-2024

Filing Number

344/2024

Filing Date

11-Sep-2024

Registration No

259/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Section Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank Bungalowpudur Rep by its Branch Manager

    Adv. R.Masilamani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S Aruljoshep

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    The witness Mohan (மோகன்) was examined on 10.03.2026 in OS.259/2025 before the Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam regarding an agricultural loan hypothecation matter. The witness affirmed the contents of his statement and submitted eight documentary exhibits (dated 22.11.2014 to 24.11.2022) relating to loan application, approval, and subsequent correspondence, which were marked and admitted. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 21-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The witness Mohan (மோகன்) was examined on 10.03.2026 in OS.259/2025 before the Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam regarding an agricultural loan hypothecation matter. The witness affirmed the contents of his statement and submitted eight documentary exhibits (dated 22.11.2014 to 24.11.2022) relating to loan application, approval, and subsequent correspondence, which were marked and admitted. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case