R. Subramaniam vs Valliammal — 855/2022

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 22. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Steps Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED080008182022

Filing Number

515/2022

Filing Date

10-Nov-2022

Registration No

855/2022

Registration Date

14-Nov-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Gobichettipalayam

Judge

1-III Additional District Judge

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Subramaniam

    Adv. R. Doraisamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Valliammal

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    Steps

    III Additional District Judge

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  14. 06-Aug-2025

    Restored

    III Additional District Judge

  15. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  16. 11-Nov-2024

    Disposed

    III Additional District Judge

  17. 29-Oct-2024

    Judgement

    III Additional District Judge

  18. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  19. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  20. 12-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In OS No. 855/2022 before the Third Additional District Court, the court admitted the plaintiff's evidence regarding a property dispute involving a promissory note dated 22-12-2020, a clear deed dated 04-11-1987, and a mortgage discharge receipt dated 19-09-2022. The court marked documentary evidence (Exh. A.1 through A.7) and deferred cross-examination of the defendant's counsel. The case is scheduled to proceed with cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  22. 10-Aug-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  23. 03-Aug-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  24. 20-Jun-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  25. 03-Apr-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  26. 23-Feb-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  27. 11-Jan-2024

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  28. 23-Nov-2023

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  29. 13-Oct-2023

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  30. 07-Sep-2023

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  31. 03-Aug-2023

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  32. 01-Jul-2023

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  33. 13-Jun-2023

    Issues

    III Additional District Judge

  34. 06-Apr-2023

    Issues

    III Additional District Judge

  35. 14-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    III Additional District Judge

  36. 25-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    III Additional District Judge

  37. 14-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    III Additional District Judge

  38. 01-Dec-2022

    Service Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  39. 23-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 10-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 855/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 855/2022 before the Third Additional District Court, the court admitted the plaintiff's evidence regarding a property dispute involving a promissory note dated 22-12-2020, a clear deed dated 04-11-1987, and a mortgage discharge receipt dated 19-09-2022. The court marked documentary evidence (Exh. A.1 through A.7) and deferred cross-examination of the defendant's counsel. The case is scheduled to proceed with cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case