si of police sathyamangalam vs Rajkumar — 72/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED070005932021
Filing Number
593/2021
Filing Date
28-Apr-2021
Registration No
72/2021
Registration Date
28-Apr-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
651
Police Station
Sathyamangalam Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.si of police sathyamangalam
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajkumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sathyamangalam acquitted accused Rajkumar of theft charges (IPC sections 457 and 380) due to insufficient prosecution evidence, despite the accused's alleged confession. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt through credible witness testimony and documentary evidence, particularly noting inconsistencies in the evidence linking the accused to the recovered stolen golden ornaments from the temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2022
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2022
Copies
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2022
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2022
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2021
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2021
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2021
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2021
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sathyamangalam acquitted accused Rajkumar of theft charges (IPC sections 457 and 380) due to insufficient prosecution evidence, despite the accused's alleged confession. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt through credible witness testimony and documentary evidence, particularly noting inconsistencies in the evidence linking the accused to the recovered stolen golden ornaments from the temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts