Sub Inspector of police vs Hari alias Keerthikan and two others — 300088/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),353,506(1). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNED070003732018
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300088/2018
Filing Date
15-11-2018
Registration No
300088/2018
Registration Date
15-11-2018
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
BhavaniSagar Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of police
Adv. Additional public prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Hari alias Keerthikan and two others
Ranjithkumar
Mohanraj
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sathyamangalam, dated 09.10.2025, recording the testimony of Prosecution Witness-3 (PW-3) in Criminal Case No. 88/2018. The witness, a government bus driver, testified about an incident involving an altercation between two persons and the accused Tiruneelakashanthar approximately 7-8 years prior. The witness's testimony was recorded, cross-examined by the defense, and the witness acknowledged and signed the deposition as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Sathyamangalam, dated 09.10.2025, recording the testimony of Prosecution Witness-3 (PW-3) in Criminal Case No. 88/2018. The witness, a government bus driver, testified about an incident involving an altercation between two persons and the accused Tiruneelakashanthar approximately 7-8 years prior. The witness's testimony was recorded, cross-examined by the defense, and the witness acknowledged and signed the deposition as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts