Thiruvengadam vs Padmavathi and another — 117/2020

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060001722020

Filing Number

202/2020

Filing Date

09-Sep-2020

Registration No

117/2020

Registration Date

14-Sep-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thiruvengadam

    Adv. K.Prakash Balaji

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Padmavathi and another

  2. 2.Selvi

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Restored

    District Munsif

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  12. 31-Mar-2021

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY The suit filed by P. Thiruvengadam seeking a declaration that the correct survey number in two 2005 Sale Deeds is S.F.No. 95/1 (instead of 95/2 mentioned in the deeds) has been dismissed without costs. The District Munsif found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient oral or documentary evidence to prove the survey number was incorrectly stated, did not establish when he discovered the error, lacked proper chain of title documentation, and failed to demonstrate that third-party rights would not be affected by the declaration sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 31-Mar-2021

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  14. 11-Mar-2021

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  15. 15-Feb-2021

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  16. 21-Jan-2021

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 21-Jan-2021

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  18. 04-Jan-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  19. 01-Dec-2020

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 28-Oct-2020

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  21. 14-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 09-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2020

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The suit filed by P. Thiruvengadam seeking a declaration that the correct survey number in two 2005 Sale Deeds is S.F.No. 95/1 (instead of 95/2 mentioned in the deeds) has been dismissed without costs. The District Munsif found that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient oral or documentary evidence to prove the survey number was incorrectly stated, did not establish when he discovered the error, lacked proper chain of title documentation, and failed to demonstrate that third-party rights would not be affected by the declaration sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case