Jayamani vs Kupplakshmi and 9 others Advocate - L.Bhuvaneswaran — 119/2019
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: Await Notice. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED060001562019
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
176/2019
Filing Date
21-06-2019
Registration No
119/2019
Registration Date
21-06-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayamani
Adv. SIVAKUMAR S.K
Respondent(s)
Kupplakshmi and 9 others Advocate - L.Bhuvaneswaran
Avinashiappan
Adv. L.Bhuvaneswaran
Karuppusamy
Adv. L.Bhuvaneswaran
Chinnaraj Kavundaiya
Adv. K.Prakash Balaji
Krishnasami gounder
Adv. Exparte
K.Palanisamy
Vimalarani
Adv. K.Prakash Balaji
K.Selvi
Adv. K.Prakash Balaji
M.Yasmin
Adv. S.A.Mohamed Mubarak
M.Salim
Adv. S.A.Mohamed Mubarak
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Await Notice
Await Notice
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Await Notice | |
| 02-04-2026 | Await Notice | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 24-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 13-02-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Court in Sathyamangalam allowed the petitioner's application under CPC Section 5 to condone a delay of 795 days in filing a petition to set aside an abatement order against the 10th defendant, who died on 03.12.2022. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that the delay occurred because the deceased's heirs were not identified in time, making it impossible to serve notice within the statutory period. The petition is admitted with conditions, including payment of Rs. 750 as costs to the 4th defendant by 16.10.2025, and the case is adjourned for further proceedings on the underlying dispute regarding property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Court in Sathyamangalam allowed the petitioner's application under CPC Section 5 to condone a delay of 795 days in filing a petition to set aside an abatement order against the 10th defendant, who died on 03.12.2022. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that the delay occurred because the deceased's heirs were not identified in time, making it impossible to serve notice within the statutory period. The petition is admitted with conditions, including payment of Rs. 750 as costs to the 4th defendant by 16.10.2025, and the case is adjourned for further proceedings on the underlying dispute regarding property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts