Perumalammal vs Poongodi Advocate - S.K.Sivakumar — 101/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U.sec27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060001082024

Arguments

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

129/2024

Filing Date

05-08-2024

Registration No

101/2024

Registration Date

05-08-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section U.sec27(c)
IA/1/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section S. Ananthan
IA/3/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section PerumalammalPoongodi

Petitioner(s)

Perumalammal

Adv. S.K.Sivakumar

kuppusamy

Adv. S.K. Sivakumar

Arappuliyammal

Adv. S.K.Sivakumar

Respondent(s)

Poongodi Advocate - S.K.Sivakumar

S. Ananthan

District Collector, Erode District for the Government of Tamil Nadu

The Tasildhar, Sathyamangalam

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

21-04-2026

Arguments

15-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

30-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary In Original Suit No. 101/2024 before the District Munsif Court, Sathy (Erode District), the court recorded the examination-in-chief of Witness 2 on January 30, 2026. The witness (defendant Krishnayathgari, age 56) testified regarding a property dispute, stating he had limited knowledge of survey numbers and other details of the properties in question. The case proceedings continue with cross-examination of the first defendant scheduled next. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Original Suit No. 101/2024 before the District Munsif Court, Sathy (Erode District), the court recorded the examination-in-chief of Witness 2 on January 30, 2026. The witness (defendant Krishnayathgari, age 56) testified regarding a property dispute, stating he had limited knowledge of survey numbers and other details of the properties in question. The case proceedings continue with cross-examination of the first defendant scheduled next. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case