Perumal vs Thangaraj and another Advocate - K.Ramesh — 200093/2013

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 40. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNED060000882013

IA Pending

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200093/2013

Filing Date

03-06-2013

Registration No

200093/2013

Registration Date

03-06-2013

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 40
IA/10/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section PerumalChinnaraj

Petitioner(s)

Perumal

Adv. C.Parthiban

Respondent(s)

Thangaraj and another Advocate - K.Ramesh

Chinnaraj

Adv. K.Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

24-04-2026

IA Pending

21-04-2026

IA Pending

18-04-2026

IA Pending

16-04-2026

IA Pending

09-04-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a cross-examination transcript in Original Suit No. 93/2013 before the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode district dated 01.04.2026. The document records the detailed cross-examination of the third defendant witness regarding a property dispute involving mortgage documents and alleged fraudulent acquisition of property. No final judgment or order is issued in this document—it is merely a record of the witness examination during trial proceedings, with the court noting that the testimony was read over and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination transcript in Original Suit No. 93/2013 before the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode district dated 01.04.2026. The document records the detailed cross-examination of the third defendant witness regarding a property dispute involving mortgage documents and alleged fraudulent acquisition of property. No final judgment or order is issued in this document—it is merely a record of the witness examination during trial proceedings, with the court noting that the testimony was read over and acknowledged as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case