Lakshmibai and 2 others vs K.P.Venkatesan and 5 others Advocate - S.A.Mohammed Mubarak — 200071/2015

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37(2). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060000742015

IA Pending

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Date

01-06-2015

Registration No

200071/2015

Registration Date

01-06-2015

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 37(2)
IA/9/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Lakshmibai and 2 othersK.P.Venkatesan and 5 others
IA/12/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Lakshmibai and 2 othersK.P.Venkatesan and 5 others

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmibai and 2 others

Adv. N.V.Baalasubramanian

Balasareswathi

Balaprakalanayaki

Respondent(s)

K.P.Venkatesan and 5 others Advocate - S.A.Mohammed Mubarak

Hemalatha

Adv. Exparte

Premabai

Adv. Exparte

Kumaresan

Adv. Exparte

Periyasamy

Adv. Exparte

Kala

Adv. Exparte

Jaanabai @ Venkatalakshmi

Lalitha @ Balasakunthalambikai

K.V.Balasampathkumar

V.Chandirasekaran

S.Vijayalakshmi

V.Ravikumar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

22-04-2026

IA Pending

10-04-2026

IA Pending

30-03-2026

IA Pending

25-03-2026

IA Pending

17-03-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

12-08-2025
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Lakshmibhai and others seeking to restrain the respondents from encumbering or alienating the suit property has been dismissed without cost. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case of imminent threat of alienation, noting that respondents rely on a registered release deed and will unchallenged for 47 years, and any future purchaser would be bound by the final decree in the partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Lakshmibhai and others seeking to restrain the respondents from encumbering or alienating the suit property has been dismissed without cost. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case of imminent threat of alienation, noting that respondents rely on a registered release deed and will unchallenged for 47 years, and any future purchaser would be bound by the final decree in the partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case