Kembamani vs Chennananjappa — 53/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section order7rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060000622022

Arguments

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

72/2022

Filing Date

20-04-2022

Registration No

53/2022

Registration Date

20-04-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section order7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Kembamani

Adv. S.Rajamani

Respondent(s)

Chennananjappa

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

22-04-2026

Arguments

16-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

16-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is an Original Suit (OS.No.53/2022) from the District Munsif Court, Sathy (Erode District) dated 16.04.2026, concerning a land dispute involving survey numbers 374/17, 374/17A, and 374/17B in Asanur village. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a revenue department witness (PW1) who testified regarding land patta (ownership) records, the subdivisions of the land parcels, and discrepancies between the patta holder names in revenue documents versus claims by the plaintiff Kembamani. The document shows witness testimony regarding land ownership documentation but does not contain a final judgment or order on the merits of the suit; it appears to be an interlocutory proceeding documenting evidence collection during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is an Original Suit (OS.No.53/2022) from the District Munsif Court, Sathy (Erode District) dated 16.04.2026, concerning a land dispute involving survey numbers 374/17, 374/17A, and 374/17B in Asanur village. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a revenue department witness (PW1) who testified regarding land patta (ownership) records, the subdivisions of the land parcels, and discrepancies between the patta holder names in revenue documents versus claims by the plaintiff Kembamani. The document shows witness testimony regarding land ownership documentation but does not contain a final judgment or order on the merits of the suit; it appears to be an interlocutory proceeding documenting evidence collection during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case