Ponnusamy and 3 others vs Ramasamy and 2 others Advocate - Exparte — 200033/2017

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 25(a),27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNED060000402017

Arguments

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200033/2017

Filing Date

08-02-2017

Registration No

200033/2017

Registration Date

08-02-2017

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 25(a),27(c)
IA/10/2024 Classification : Injunction Petition Section Ponnusamy and 3 othersRamasamy and 2 others
IA/11/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Ponnusamy and 3 othersRamasamy and 2 others

Petitioner(s)

Ponnusamy and 3 others

Adv. G.Sundaram

Ponnammal

Adv. G.Sundaram

M.Vadivel

Adv. G.Sundaram

Lakhsmi

Adv. G.Sundaram

Respondent(s)

Ramasamy and 2 others Advocate - Exparte

Venkatesan

Adv. Exparte

Rasu

Adv. Exparte

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

22-04-2026

Arguments

15-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The District Munsif, Sathyamangalam dismissed a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to amend the plaint under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The court held that the proposed amendment, based on a property sale deed executed during the suit's pendency, was unrelated to the original suit property and constituted an impermissible attempt to cure defects arising during trial. The petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Munsif, Sathyamangalam dismissed a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to amend the plaint under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The court held that the proposed amendment, based on a property sale deed executed during the suit's pendency, was unrelated to the original suit property and constituted an impermissible attempt to cure defects arising during trial. The petition was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case