Nirmala vs Rasu and 9 others — 42/2024
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED060000372024
Filing Number
43/2024
Filing Date
28-Feb-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
01-Mar-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nirmala
Adv. M.Senniappan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rasu and 9 others
-
2.Kamala
-
3.K.K.kaliappan
-
4.Rajendran
-
5.Raja
-
6.Srirangan
-
7.The VAO officer
-
8.The Revenue Inspector
-
9.The dashildar
-
10.Its Representative District Collector for the Government of Tamil Nadu.
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition
This is a civil property dispute case (OS.No.42/2024) from the District Munsif Court, Sathy, Erode District, heard on 03.03.2026. The document records the cross-examination of Witness 1 (plaintiff Nirmala) regarding a disputed property that includes both residential and commercial portions. The witness testified about her 35 years of possession, the property's boundaries, and alleged encroachment issues, though her testimony contained inconsistencies regarding the adjacent temple's location and unauthorized construction. The court's order is not yet concluded in this excerpt—it appears to be an ongoing examination proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
24-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition
-
03-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
30-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
10-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
13-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
06-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
21-Oct-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Aug-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
24-Jul-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Jul-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2024
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2024
This is a civil property dispute case (OS.No.42/2024) from the District Munsif Court, Sathy, Erode District, heard on 03.03.2026. The document records the cross-examination of Witness 1 (plaintiff Nirmala) regarding a disputed property that includes both residential and commercial portions. The witness testified about her 35 years of possession, the property's boundaries, and alleged encroachment issues, though her testimony contained inconsistencies regarding the adjacent temple's location and unauthorized construction. The court's order is not yet concluded in this excerpt—it appears to be an ongoing examination proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts