R.Thanyapavithra vs S.P.Thangavel — 29/2023

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060000362023

Filing Number

45/2023

Filing Date

15-Feb-2023

Registration No

29/2023

Registration Date

15-Feb-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Thanyapavithra

    Adv. S.Helen Elizabeth

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.P.Thangavel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 02-Dec-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In this Tamil Nadu civil case (OS No. 29/2023, District Munsif Court, Sathy, decided December 2, 2025), the court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a 2-acre agricultural land where he cultivated coconut saplings and relied on a settlement document (Exhibit A-2) from 2018 as evidence of his claim. The court examined documentary evidence (Exhibits A-1 and A-2) regarding the land's permanent possession but found the evidence insufficient to establish the plaintiff's entitlement to permanent rights over the agricultural property, noting that certain facts cannot be verified after harvest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 25-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  25. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  29. 16-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  30. 18-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  31. 03-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  32. 20-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  33. 04-Mar-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    District Munsif

  34. 14-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  35. 06-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  36. 05-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  37. 21-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  38. 08-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  39. 19-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  40. 16-Dec-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  41. 09-Dec-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  42. 03-Dec-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  43. 16-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  44. 24-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  45. 17-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  46. 04-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  47. 30-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  48. 10-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  49. 03-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  50. 16-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  51. 02-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  52. 11-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  53. 18-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  54. 25-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  55. 05-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  56. 21-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  57. 18-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  58. 02-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  59. 21-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  60. 25-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  61. 16-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  62. 15-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  63. 16-Mar-2023

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  64. 15-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 15-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Tamil Nadu civil case (OS No. 29/2023, District Munsif Court, Sathy, decided December 2, 2025), the court recorded the plaintiff's testimony regarding a 2-acre agricultural land where he cultivated coconut saplings and relied on a settlement document (Exhibit A-2) from 2018 as evidence of his claim. The court examined documentary evidence (Exhibits A-1 and A-2) regarding the land's permanent possession but found the evidence insufficient to establish the plaintiff's entitlement to permanent rights over the agricultural property, noting that certain facts cannot be verified after harvest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case