S.C.P.Ilangovan vs K.K.Seenivasan — 52/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 43(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED060000122024

Filing Number

13/2024

Filing Date

05-Jan-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

27-Mar-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 43(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.C.P.Ilangovan

    Adv. S.A.Mohamed Mubarak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.K.Seenivasan

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary This is a civil suit (OS No. 52/2024) heard by the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode District on 13.03.2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff regarding a lease dispute over a property leased to the defendant (Srinivasan) from 05.05.2015 for three years at ₹1,000/month. The plaintiff testified that the defendant never paid rent or the advance deposit of ₹30,000, failed to construct the building as agreed, and remained untraceable after 2016, with the plaintiff sending legal notices in 2018 regarding the breach of lease terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  19. 14-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  21. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  22. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  24. 10-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  25. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  26. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  28. 18-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  29. 26-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  30. 19-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  31. 10-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  32. 12-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  33. 09-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  34. 03-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  35. 18-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  36. 25-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  37. 30-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 12-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  39. 05-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  40. 12-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  41. 12-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  42. 29-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  43. 27-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 05-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a civil suit (OS No. 52/2024) heard by the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode District on 13.03.2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff regarding a lease dispute over a property leased to the defendant (Srinivasan) from 05.05.2015 for three years at ₹1,000/month. The plaintiff testified that the defendant never paid rent or the advance deposit of ₹30,000, failed to construct the building as agreed, and remained untraceable after 2016, with the plaintiff sending legal notices in 2018 regarding the breach of lease terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case