Arulraj vs Mamani — 378/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050008012023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
830/2023
Filing Date
14-08-2023
Registration No
378/2023
Registration Date
14-08-2023
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulraj
Adv. V.C.Ajeethkumar
Respondent(s)
Mamani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Mediation
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 04-11-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 08-10-2025 | Mediation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the plaintiff's suit and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 5,75,850/-, comprising the original loan amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- plus accrued interest, with future interest at 9% per annum until decree and 6% thereafter. The court accepted the plaintiff's testimony supported by the promissory note and witness evidence, finding the defendant's ex parte status (failure to appear) left his loan obligation unrefuted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam decreed the plaintiff's suit and ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 5,75,850/-, comprising the original loan amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- plus accrued interest, with future interest at 9% per annum until decree and 6% thereafter. The court accepted the plaintiff's testimony supported by the promissory note and witness evidence, finding the defendant's ex parte status (failure to appear) left his loan obligation unrefuted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts