S.K.Abdul Aleem Saheb sons, Aleem beedi compant, Rep by its power agent Nallasamy vs Shahnaz Memorials, Sole proprietorship, proprietor Aleejiba Fathima — 370/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050007992023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
827/2023
Filing Date
11-08-2023
Registration No
370/2023
Registration Date
11-08-2023
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.K.Abdul Aleem Saheb sons, Aleem beedi compant, Rep by its power agent Nallasamy
Adv. B.Muralidharan
Respondent(s)
Shahnaz Memorials, Sole proprietorship, proprietor Aleejiba Fathima
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Stay
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Stay | |
| 05-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 17-11-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 01-11-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 28-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Subordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam, dismissed the defendant's application seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 11.03.2025. The court found the defendant's claim of severe viral fever unsupported by medical evidence and noted that the defendant had simultaneously filed a parallel suit in another jurisdiction, indicating deliberate avoidance rather than incapacity. The failure to file a written statement alongside the application further demonstrated lack of genuine intent to contest the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Subordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam, dismissed the defendant's application seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 11.03.2025. The court found the defendant's claim of severe viral fever unsupported by medical evidence and noted that the defendant had simultaneously filed a parallel suit in another jurisdiction, indicating deliberate avoidance rather than incapacity. The failure to file a written statement alongside the application further demonstrated lack of genuine intent to contest the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts