State bank of India Sathyamangalam Branch represented by its Branch Manager vs M.Basuvanna — 314/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050006622023
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
683/2023
Filing Date
21-06-2023
Registration No
314/2023
Registration Date
03-07-2023
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State bank of India Sathyamangalam Branch represented by its Branch Manager
Adv. L.Bhuvaneswaran
Respondent(s)
M.Basuvanna
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 314/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Gogulakrishnan (Assistant Manager, SBI) on March 11, 2026. The witness's affidavit dated 04.03.2020 was admitted as evidence, and various loan-related documents (personal loan application, joint agreement, loan arrangement application, loan revival letter, and account statements dated 04.03.2020 to 31.03.2023) were marked as exhibits. The defendant did not appear, and no cross-examination was conducted; the witness acknowledged the documents as correct and signed before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 314/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of witness Gogulakrishnan (Assistant Manager, SBI) on March 11, 2026. The witness's affidavit dated 04.03.2020 was admitted as evidence, and various loan-related documents (personal loan application, joint agreement, loan arrangement application, loan revival letter, and account statements dated 04.03.2020 to 31.03.2023) were marked as exhibits. The defendant did not appear, and no cross-examination was conducted; the witness acknowledged the documents as correct and signed before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts