Sundarammal vs Rangasamy and 5 others — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or43R1sec104. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

CNR: TNED050006482025

Filing Number

676/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or43R1sec104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sundarammal

    Adv. P.Thamarai manalan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rangasamy and 5 others

  2. 2.Vaideeswari

  3. 3.Tamilarasan

  4. 4.Subramani

  5. 5.Ayyasamy

  6. 6.Udhayakumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam dismissed Sundarammal's appeal and upheld the trial court's order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to measure and demarcate boundaries between the disputed properties. The court found that while the suit nominally sought injunction, the core dispute fundamentally involved identifying and fixing the precise boundary line between adjoining survey fields where coconut saplings were planted. The court reasoned that oral evidence alone cannot accurately identify survey boundaries or resolve encroachment disputes, making the Commissioner's appointment necessary and proper under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure to facilitate effective adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Batta

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Subordinate Court of Sathyamangalam dismissed Sundarammal's appeal and upheld the trial court's order appointing an Advocate Commissioner to measure and demarcate boundaries between the disputed properties. The court found that while the suit nominally sought injunction, the core dispute fundamentally involved identifying and fixing the precise boundary line between adjoining survey fields where coconut saplings were planted. The court reasoned that oral evidence alone cannot accurately identify survey boundaries or resolve encroachment disputes, making the Commissioner's appointment necessary and proper under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure to facilitate effective adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case