D.R.Mohan and 1 another vs M.Saroja and 1 another Advocate - R.Saravanamurthy and S.S.Sridharan — 100110/2016
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050003972016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
02-06-2016
Registration No
100110/2016
Registration Date
02-06-2016
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.R.Mohan and 1 another
Adv. K.T.Rajan, E.Kannan
R.Kalaiselvan
Respondent(s)
M.Saroja and 1 another Advocate - R.Saravanamurthy and S.S.Sridharan
R.Subha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 16-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 06-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Sathyamangalam dismissed the plaintiffs' petition to appoint an advocate commissioner to record cross-examination of witness PW4 at his residence. The court found the plaintiffs' claims that PW4 was bedridden due to a leg fracture and diabetic foot ulcer to be unsubstantiated, noting they filed no medical certificates or documentary evidence despite the alleged four-month-old injury. The court observed that PW4 had already appeared in court on 13.03.2024 and was directed to appear with counsel on 19.03.2024, making the petition frivolous and an attempt to unnecessarily delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Sathyamangalam dismissed the plaintiffs' petition to appoint an advocate commissioner to record cross-examination of witness PW4 at his residence. The court found the plaintiffs' claims that PW4 was bedridden due to a leg fracture and diabetic foot ulcer to be unsubstantiated, noting they filed no medical certificates or documentary evidence despite the alleged four-month-old injury. The court observed that PW4 had already appeared in court on 13.03.2024 and was directed to appear with counsel on 19.03.2024, making the petition frivolous and an attempt to unnecessarily delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts