State Bank Of India K N Palayam Branch Rep By Its Branch Manager vs K.M.Saravanan — 144/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNED050003942024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-06-2024
Filing Number
400/2024
Filing Date
12-07-2024
Registration No
144/2024
Registration Date
16-07-2024
Court
Sub Court, Sathyamangalam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank Of India K N Palayam Branch Rep By Its Branch Manager
Adv. M.G.Shajukumar
Respondent(s)
K.M.Saravanan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is an Original Suit (O.S. No.144/2024) from the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu. The order records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (Mr. Vignesh, Assistant Manager, SBI) on February 3, 2026, wherein the witness testified regarding various loan-related documents and agreements dated 2016-2024. The defendant did not appear, resulting in an ex-parte determination, with no cross-examination conducted. The court admitted the witness's affidavit and various documentary exhibits (marked as Exhibits 1-7) into evidence and indicated willingness to grant appropriate relief based on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is an Original Suit (O.S. No.144/2024) from the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu. The order records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (Mr. Vignesh, Assistant Manager, SBI) on February 3, 2026, wherein the witness testified regarding various loan-related documents and agreements dated 2016-2024. The defendant did not appear, resulting in an ex-parte determination, with no cross-examination conducted. The court admitted the witness's affidavit and various documentary exhibits (marked as Exhibits 1-7) into evidence and indicated willingness to grant appropriate relief based on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts