State Bank Of India K N Palayam Branch Rep By Its Branch Manager vs K.M.Saravanan — 144/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7 Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED050003942024

Arguments

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-06-2024

Filing Number

400/2024

Filing Date

12-07-2024

Registration No

144/2024

Registration Date

16-07-2024

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

State Bank Of India K N Palayam Branch Rep By Its Branch Manager

Adv. M.G.Shajukumar

Respondent(s)

K.M.Saravanan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

30-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Arguments

03-02-2026

Arguments

27-01-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

Interim Orders

03-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is an Original Suit (O.S. No.144/2024) from the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu. The order records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (Mr. Vignesh, Assistant Manager, SBI) on February 3, 2026, wherein the witness testified regarding various loan-related documents and agreements dated 2016-2024. The defendant did not appear, resulting in an ex-parte determination, with no cross-examination conducted. The court admitted the witness's affidavit and various documentary exhibits (marked as Exhibits 1-7) into evidence and indicated willingness to grant appropriate relief based on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is an Original Suit (O.S. No.144/2024) from the Subordinate Court at Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu. The order records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff's witness (Mr. Vignesh, Assistant Manager, SBI) on February 3, 2026, wherein the witness testified regarding various loan-related documents and agreements dated 2016-2024. The defendant did not appear, resulting in an ex-parte determination, with no cross-examination conducted. The court admitted the witness's affidavit and various documentary exhibits (marked as Exhibits 1-7) into evidence and indicated willingness to grant appropriate relief based on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case