P.Palaniammal and 3 others vs M.Palanisamy and 3 others — 157/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Additional Written Statement Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNED050003572022

Filing Number

378/2022

Filing Date

28-Jul-2022

Registration No

157/2022

Registration Date

28-Jul-2022

Court

Sub Court, Sathyamangalam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Palaniammal and 3 others

    Adv. P.Thatchinamurthy

  2. 2.A.Valliammal

  3. 3.V.Selvi

  4. 4.E.Rasathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Palanisamy and 3 others

  2. 2.P.Saravanakumar

  3. 3.V.Suseela

  4. 4.V.Pushpalatha

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Additional Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.3/2023 in O.S.No.157 of 2022 | Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam | Date: 17 November 2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered the impleadment of proposed respondents 5 and 6 (Kanagaraj and Rangasamy) as necessary parties to the main partition suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC. The plaintiffs challenged property alienations made during the dispute, and the court found that respondents 5 and 6, who claim derivative title through registered sale deeds, must participate to enable effective and complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity of litigation. The plaint shall be amended accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 07-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 12-Aug-2024

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 24-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 11-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 05-Dec-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 20-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 03-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 11-Sep-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 08-Aug-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 24-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 18-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 13-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 19-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 17-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 01-Sep-2022

    Service Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 28-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 28-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: I.A.No.3/2023 in O.S.No.157 of 2022 | Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam | Date: 17 November 2025 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered the impleadment of proposed respondents 5 and 6 (Kanagaraj and Rangasamy) as necessary parties to the main partition suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC. The plaintiffs challenged property alienations made during the dispute, and the court found that respondents 5 and 6, who claim derivative title through registered sale deeds, must participate to enable effective and complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity of litigation. The plaint shall be amended accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case